Where a clever answer is not enough
An AI can reason and call tools, but the product still has to answer operational questions: who owns the run, which actions are allowed, and what can the operator review?
A buyer cannot operate a workflow if ownership, permissions, review points, and evidence are scattered across logs and chat transcripts.
Give the workflow an operating boundary
Stable Harness gives the workflow an operating boundary. The buyer sees a system that can be run, paused, reviewed, and explained.
The product should make the run legible to operators before they need to inspect the underlying framework.
Operating questions before rollout
The buyer should evaluate whether people can intervene without rebuilding the run by hand.
flowchart LR A[User pain] --> B[Bounded workflow] B --> C[Reviewable action] C --> D[Operational evidence] D --> E[Repeatable outcome]
What to check in production
The buyer should judge whether operators can intervene without reading raw logs or rewriting product code.
The useful outcome is an AI workflow a team can operate, not only a final answer it can admire.